White Paper Series
Sustainability and Digital Infrastructure
Digital Infrastructure at a Crossroads
The global rise of data centers and a green path forward.
A B S T R A C T
The global proliferation of data centers, from hyperscale campuses in Virginia and Oregon to micro-facilities serving small island nations across the Caribbean and Pacific, has emerged as one of the defining infrastructure stories of the twenty-first century. Driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing, streaming media, and the Internet of Things, global data center electricity consumption reached approximately 415 TWh in 2024 and is projected to nearly double by 2030 under the IEA base-case scenario. This paper examines the emergence of data centers globally, analyses their ten most significant environmental drawbacks with particular emphasis on water consumption and gray water generation, and proposes actionable green solutions grounded in current research, policy frameworks, and emerging best practices.
Key takeaways
- Global data center electricity demand is projected to reach approximately 945 TWh by 2030, nearly 3 per cent of global consumption.
- Freshwater for cooling is now a systemic risk: a single hyperscale facility can consume between 1 and 5 million gallons per day.
- Solutions exist today: direct-liquid and immersion cooling, gray water recycling, 24/7 carbon-free energy, and waste heat recovery. They require institutional will and harmonized disclosure.
- For Small Island Developing States, climate-resilient digital infrastructure is no longer optional. It is existential.
Section 1
1. The Data Center Imperative
Data centers are the physical backbone of the digital economy. Every cloud-stored photograph, every streamed video, every AI-generated response, and even routine financial transactions depend on the uninterrupted operation of server facilities that consume enormous quantities of electricity and water. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2025), global data centers consumed approximately 415 TWh in 2024, an estimated 1.5 per cent of global electricity consumption, and that figure is projected to reach 945 TWh by 2030 in the base-case scenario, representing nearly 3 per cent of global electricity demand.
The intersection of urgency and opportunity is unmistakable. The world cannot simply halt data center construction. These facilities are indispensable to the modern economy and to digital equity objectives in developing nations. However, continued expansion on the current trajectory is incompatible with global climate targets established by the Paris Agreement. This paper concludes that a suite of integrated green solutions, including water recycling, advanced cooling, renewable energy sourcing, and circular economy approaches, can dramatically reduce the environmental footprint of data centers without compromising operational performance.
Section 2
2. Global Emergence of Data Centers
2.1 Hyperscale growth in developed economies
The United States, Europe and China collectively account for more than 70 per cent of global data center floor space (JLL, 2024). Hyperscale facilities, defined as those exceeding 100 MW of IT load capacity, are now constructed by Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud and Meta at a pace without precedent in the recorded series. Northern Virginia’s “Data Center Alley” has become the single largest data center market in the world, hosting over 35 per cent of global internet traffic and approximately 4,000 MW of commissioned capacity. Dublin, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Paris and London (the FLAP-D markets) dominate European capacity. Singapore, Tokyo and Sydney lead in Asia-Pacific.
Investment is accelerating. Major hyperscalers have committed a combined USD 320 billion in capital expenditure for 2025, up from USD 230 billion the previous year, driven primarily by the compute demands of large language models and generative AI workloads.
2.2 Emerging markets and developing nations
A less discussed but critically important trend is the rapid expansion of data center infrastructure across the Global South and among Small Island Developing States. The push is driven by data sovereignty regulations and growing demand for local cloud services. Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa and Egypt are building regional hub facilities. Latin American growth is accelerating in Brazil, Chile and Mexico.
The emergence of micro-scale and edge data centers across SIDS warrants closer attention. Nations such as Barbados, Jamaica, Fiji, the Maldives and Tonga have invested in national data infrastructure to support e-government services and financial inclusion platforms. These island nations face compounded challenges: limited freshwater, high energy costs from fossil-fuel dependence, and extreme vulnerability to climate-related disasters. For SIDS, the imperative to adopt green data center solutions is not merely environmental. It is existential.
Section 3
3. The United States Data Center Landscape
3.1 Scale and market concentration
The United States hosts approximately 5,375 data centers as of 2024, more than any other nation (Statista, 2024). The total US market is valued at over USD 250 billion and is growing at approximately 10.9 per cent CAGR. Northern Virginia consumes approximately 26 per cent of the state’s electricity. Phoenix, Dallas/Fort Worth, Atlanta, Chicago, Seattle and Columbus, Ohio have all emerged as major hubs.
The DOE’s 2024 report found that data centers consumed 4.4 per cent of total US electricity in 2023 and projects that share could reach 12 per cent by 2028, reshaping utility planning horizons and raising fundamental questions about grid stability and environmental justice.
3.2 Policy and grid pressure
The PJM Interconnection, serving 13 states, reported in 2024 that data center load growth was the single largest driver of new grid interconnection requests, creating queues totaling more than 1,000 GW of proposed capacity (LBNL, 2024). State responses vary: Virginia passed the Digital Infrastructure and Jobs Act; Arizona imposed temporary moratoriums in drought-stressed regions; California requires increasingly stringent water and energy reporting. A comprehensive federal regulatory framework targeting private sector data center environmental performance remains absent. This necessitates a harmonized federal disclosure standard as a foundational step toward market accountability.
Section 4
4. The Ten Principal Environmental Drawbacks
4.1 Energy consumption and carbon emissions
Global data centers consumed approximately 415 TWh in 2024. US facilities alone account for an estimated 180 TWh, roughly equivalent to the entire electricity consumption of California. Microsoft’s 2024 Environmental Sustainability Report acknowledged absolute carbon emissions had increased by 30 per cent since 2020, driven primarily by data center construction and AI workload. The IEA projects data center emissions will account for approximately 1 per cent of global CO₂ by 2030.
4.2 Freshwater consumption for cooling
A single hyperscale data center can consume between 1 and 5 million gallons of water per day. A 2023 study from UC Riverside estimated that training a single LLM such as GPT-3 consumed approximately 700,000 litres of freshwater for cooling. Google’s 2024 Environmental Report disclosed that its global operations consumed approximately 5.6 billion gallons of water.
KEY FINDING
Hydrological assessments now belong on par with grid capacity analysis.
Water stress is not a peripheral issue; it is a systemic risk to data center viability. VerdAbility’s due diligence methodology now treats hydrological assessments on par with grid capacity analysis in any data center transaction.
4.3 Gray water generation and discharge
Cooling towers continuously recirculate water and periodically discharge blowdown water that has accumulated mineral salts, biocides, corrosion inhibitors and anti-scaling agents. This blowdown, classified as gray water, requires treatment before discharge. In water-stressed regions, the volume and chemical load places additional burden on treatment infrastructure and can degrade receiving water bodies.
4.4 Electronic waste
Server hardware carries an operational lifespan of 3 to 5 years. The global volume of e-waste from data centers contributes to an estimated 62 million metric tons annually. Hardware contains lead, cadmium, mercury and brominated flame retardants. Smaller operators often rely on downstream recyclers with inconsistent environmental standards.
4.5 Land use and habitat disruption
Hyperscale campuses require 100 to 500 acres each, displacing natural habitats, agricultural land and wetlands. In Northern Virginia, expansion has encroached on Civil War battlefields and rural communities. In Arizona and Nevada, data centers are being sited in desert ecosystems already stressed by prolonged drought.
4.6 Air quality impacts from diesel backup generators
Diesel-powered backup generators emit PM2.5, NOx and VOCs. In densely developed markets such as Northern Virginia, cumulative emissions from hundreds of generators constitute a measurable local air quality concern.
4.7 Noise pollution and community disruption
Cooling infrastructure produces noise levels of 60 to 75 decibels at the fence line. Residents in Ashburn, Virginia, and Mesa, Arizona have filed noise complaints and pursued legal proceedings.
4.8 Refrigerant emissions and greenhouse forcing
HFC refrigerants have global warming potentials hundreds to thousands of times greater than CO₂. The Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol mandates phase-down of HFCs.
4.9 Strain on water infrastructure in arid regions
Mesa and Goodyear, Arizona have experienced significant public backlash over data center water allocations amid drought conditions that have depleted the Colorado River system to historically low levels.
4.10 Light pollution
Large data center campuses contribute to light pollution that disrupts nocturnal ecosystems, migratory bird patterns and human circadian rhythms.
Section 5
5. Green Solutions: A Comprehensive Framework
5.1 Transition to renewable energy and on-site generation
The most impactful single intervention is the transition to 100 per cent renewable electricity via PPAs, direct ownership of generating assets and green tariffs. Microsoft, Google and Apple have made binding 24/7 carbon-free energy commitments. For island nations, microgrid solutions combining solar PV, battery storage and green hydrogen offer resilient zero-carbon alternatives.
5.2 Advanced cooling technologies to reduce water consumption
Direct liquid cooling and immersion cooling are the two most promising approaches. Microsoft’s Project Natick demonstrated subsea data center cooling using ambient seawater. Green Mountain Data Centre in Norway operates entirely freshwater-free using fjord seawater.
5.3 Gray water recycling and closed-loop water systems
On-site water treatment can recover 40 to 70 per cent of blowdown volume for non-potable applications. Meta’s Mesa, Arizona facilities have committed to 100 per cent recycled water. Microsoft has set a “water positive” goal: returning more water to local watersheds than it consumes by 2030.
5.4 Circular economy approaches to e-waste
Operators should adopt extended producer responsibility principles. Hardware should be selected for repairability and component reuse. Operators should require e-Stewards or R2-certified recyclers and provide chain-of-custody documentation.
5.5 Sustainable site selection and green building design
Future development should prioritise brownfield sites and avoid ecologically sensitive areas. Green building certifications, including LEED for Data Centers, BREEAM and TIA-942, provide frameworks for energy efficiency, water conservation and materials sustainability.
5.6 Diesel generator phase-out
Stationary fuel cell systems (hydrogen or biogas), advanced battery energy storage and flywheel UPS are technically feasible alternatives. California’s Air Resources Board has begun requiring transition pathways away from diesel by 2035.
5.7 Heat recovery and waste heat utilisation
Stockholm Data Parks recovers waste heat into the city’s district heating network, providing carbon-free heat to tens of thousands of homes. Similar models are operational in Helsinki, Amsterdam and several Swiss cities.
5.8 Artificial intelligence for operational optimisation
Google DeepMind’s reinforcement learning application achieved a 40 per cent reduction in cooling energy consumption and 15 per cent reduction in overall PUE, one of the most significant demonstrated efficiency gains in the industry. Carbon-aware computing routes compute tasks to facilities with the cleanest available grid electricity.
5.9 Policy advocacy and regulatory frameworks
Aligned stakeholders should advocate for mandatory environmental reporting analogous to the EU’s Energy Efficiency Directive, alongside binding WUE and PUE standards. Federal IRA tax incentives should be extended to green retrofits.
5.10 Community engagement and environmental justice
Data center siting disproportionately affects lower-income communities and communities of colour. Community benefit agreements should guarantee local hiring, infrastructure investment and environmental monitoring with independent oversight that includes community representation.
Section 6
6. Conclusions
The global emergence of data centers represents both an unprecedented infrastructure achievement and a mounting environmental challenge. The environmental consequences (energy consumption surging toward 945 TWh globally by 2030, freshwater depletion measured in billions of gallons annually, gray water discharge, electronic waste, habitat disruption) are real and measurable. Absent concerted solutions, these factors will compound with every server rack installed.
The green solutions outlined in this paper are not speculative. Direct liquid cooling and immersion cooling can eliminate evaporative water consumption. Closed-loop systems and gray water recycling can prevent harmful discharge. Renewable energy and 24/7 CFE commitments can decarbonise operations. AI-driven optimisation can extract significant efficiency gains. Waste heat recovery can convert an environmental liability into a community asset.
What is needed is the institutional will to act with urgency. VerdAbility calls on data center operators, technology companies, investors, policymakers and host communities to adopt and enforce the green solutions described herein, to require rigorous environmental disclosure, and to treat sustainable digital infrastructure as a non-negotiable condition of operating in a world increasingly dependent on, and threatened by, the unchecked growth of the digital economy.
Bibliography
References
Carbon Brief (2025) ‘AI: Five charts that put data-centre energy use and emissions into context’, September.
CBRE (2024) Global data center trends 2024. CBRE Research.
Energy Information Administration (2025) Short-term energy outlook. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
Evans, R. and Gao, J. (2016) ‘DeepMind AI reduces Google data centre cooling bill by 40%’, DeepMind Blog, 20 July.
Global E-Waste Monitor (2024) The global e-waste monitor 2024. United Nations University and UNITAR.
Google (2024) 2024 environmental report. Mountain View: Alphabet Inc.
Grand View Research (2024) U.S. data center market size, share and trends analysis report, 2024 to 2030.
Green Mountain (2023) Sustainability report 2023: water-free data center operations. Stavanger: Green Mountain AS.
International Energy Agency (2025) Energy and AI. Paris: IEA.
International Energy Agency (2025) Electricity 2025: analysis and forecast to 2027. Paris: IEA.
International Telecommunication Union (2023) Digital infrastructure for small island developing states. Geneva: ITU.
JLL (2024) Global data center outlook 2024. Jones Lang LaSalle.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2024) United States data center energy usage report: 2023 update. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
Li, P., Yang, J., Islam, M.A. and Ren, S. (2023) ‘Making AI less thirsty: uncovering and addressing the secret water footprint of AI models’, arXiv preprint.
Microsoft (2024) Microsoft 2024 environmental sustainability report. Redmond: Microsoft Corporation.
Mytton, D. (2021) ‘Data centre water consumption’, npj Clean Water, 4(1), 11.
Shehabi, A. et al. (2016) United States data center energy usage report (LBNL-1005775). Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Statista (2024) Number of data centers worldwide by country 2024. Statista Research Department.
Stockholm Exergi (2023) Annual and sustainability report 2023. Stockholm: Stockholm Exergi AB.
Turner and Townsend (2024) International construction market survey 2024: data centers. Turner and Townsend Group.
Glossary
Glossary of Acronyms
| BESS | Battery Energy Storage System |
| BREEAM | Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method |
| CARICOM | Caribbean Community |
| CFE | Carbon-Free Energy |
| CO₂ | Carbon Dioxide |
| DLC | Direct Liquid Cooling |
| DOE | U.S. Department of Energy |
| EPR | Extended Producer Responsibility |
| HFC | Hydrofluorocarbon |
| IEA | International Energy Agency |
| IRA | Inflation Reduction Act (U.S.) |
| LEED | Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design |
| LLM | Large Language Model |
| NPDES | National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System |
| PJM | PJM Interconnection (Mid-Atlantic US grid) |
| PM2.5 | Particulate Matter (2.5 micrometres or smaller) |
| PPA | Power Purchase Agreement |
| PUE | Power Usage Effectiveness |
| SIDS | Small Island Developing States |
| TWh | Terawatt-hour |
| UPS | Uninterruptible Power Supply |
| WUE | Water Usage Effectiveness |
